NATIVE INSTRUMENTS FM7 PATCH LIST SOFTWARE

ДЇM synths 're programming nightmare ,but i've managed to do some decent dubby-subby synth bass patches with 'thump-click' at the envelope start (lately bass variations ,lost of ppl used similar patches iduring 80ies ).I transferred my beloved and carefully tweaked patches from TX802 (multitimbral DX7 rack )via sysex and imported them in FM7. Virtual synths 're getting better every year and i had chance to compare some of them side by side. I'm synth freak ,i've been 'programming' synths since juno 106 ,dx7 and atari days ,and i played/owned with lots of 'real' stuff. No virtual waveform ever stopped a good song from being a good song. I slammed the CS80V through PSP's Vintage Warmer and I came pretty close to the real deal.ДЄt the end of the day, I never really bother with wondering if a softsynth perfectly emulates its hardware forebears. The CS80V's waveforms were much more precise (though, unlike the Nord's, not impossibly perfect). When A/B'ing the raw waveforms from the Yamaha CS80V and my own real CS synths, I saw that the waves of the real deal had been somewhat 'rounded off'. I personally love the sound of Nords for what they are (not because they capture analogue accurately.they do not), but they are not inherently better than, say, the Virsyn stuff.ДЄlso, do remember that you can take steps to add some authenticity to your virtual synths.

NATIVE INSTRUMENTS FM7 PATCH LIST SOFTWARE

In my own opinion, the best of the software synths come as close to their goal as the virtual analogue hardware boxes. If you are looking for a perfect Minimoog emulation, you won't find it in Reaktor, but you might find something that does the job just as well. An easy to use modular that focuses on acoustic modeling, the analogue is, nevertheless, incredible.ДЄs for Reaktor, wasn't designed to specifically emulate anything, but is pretty neat in its own right. Most people don't realize how very good the analogue modeling in Tassman is. It isn't modeled on anything vintage, and does a lot more than analogue. Of all the softsynths I have ever tried, this one sounded the closest to my analogue hardware. Their MinimoogV is the only softsynth that ever compelled me to roll-off the low end a bit. Well, not as close as the G-Media (and they have a Mini coming), but then, since every Mini I ever touched sounded different, it'd be hard to say. Very nice.ДЄs you say, it was pretty difficult to get wrong. Sounds as horrible (in a good way) as the original, if you want it to. Waldorf is belly-up, but you can still find some of these at bargain prices. Use this in a song, and no one would ever question its authenticity (but no one ever does anyhow, do they?). Here are some of the notable recreations I have encountered. What I have found is that software can indeed be a reasonable replacement, depending on the software and the hardware you are trying to emulate. I've got a pretty massive collection of new and vintage hardware synths, as well as just about every softsynth out there (I write for Computer Music magazine), and I have compared a lot of hardware and software side-by-side. Note that all of the Arturia products are extremely processor intensive and might need a computer dedicated to running them (separate from a DAW) to achieve ideal performance. I can't compare those to the real counterparts (my other car is a Moog Modular, as they say, but it's in the shop), but I did A/B the Arturia Minimoog versus the Moog emulation in the Alesis Ion and I thought the Arturia software won hands down for sounding closer to a real analog synth. In my opinion the most 'realistic'-sounding software emulations available today are the Arturia synths: Minimoog, Moog Modular and CS-80. Like a lot of the specific software you mentioned Reason and ReBirth are a little dated, written for computers that were much less powerful than what we have today and as much concerned with running with little processor power as with creating highly realistic emulations. I think it would be fair to say nobody buys Reason for the quality of any of its specific instruments and instead because it's a bargain and a great tool for sketching out song ideas. Reason doesn't have a real counterpart either its Subtractor analog-style synth is very weak compared not only to real analog synths but to other software. Reaktor doesn't have a 'real counterpart' but if it did I'd be highly interested in owning one. On the other end of the spectrum is Pro-53, which is as close to a Prophet 5 as a Pepperoni-flavored Slim Jim is to a slice of Chicago-style Pizza. I think the short answer is 'no.' The long answer is it depends on what you are using it for, and there are some exceptions.ДЇor example NI's FM7 is a literal recreation of the DX7 so it should sound exactly the same except for the D/A converters you are running it through to monitor it.

Native instruments fm7 patch list